At the risk of making yet another political post…
Leonard Stark, in his book “Choosing a Leader”, suggests that candidates be evaluated on three specific criteria: acceptability, electability and competence. That is to say that they should be ideologically acceptable to their parties, capable of winning elections and able to implement their policy objectives.
Based on those criteria, I would like to know how you view the current crop of presidential candidates. Objectively, please – you might think Trump is a schmuck, you might think Clinton is untrustworthy, you might just not like someone’s hair, but those aren’t what I want to hear. How are they on acceptability, electability and competence?